Who won battlebots 2018
Kung Fu Panda 3 is still enjoyable, but its strengthlies on the theme of questionable identity posed by the two competingfathers of the film: Mr. This subplot eventuallyclears up what we did not know about the pandas in this universe, andof course the film goes to great lengths to make comedy out of how lazypandas turn out to be.The jokes used in this film are just rehashed jokes from the first twofilms, not providing great comedy as its predecessors since it provesto be unoriginal. Pandaswere known to heal Oogway with this power in the past, and it is ofcourse the only way to stop Simmons' character.
#Who won battlebots 2018 movie#
wellwho cares? The film simply establishes he is a bad guy who wantsrevenge and to have control over the real world - you know, yourtypical one-dimensional children's movie villain.Po's father, played by Bryan Cranston, finds him at the start of thefilm, which is really convenient because pandas are supposed to knowabout something called 'chi' which is what the villain is after. He manages to escapethe spirit realm (this universe's equivalent of the afterlife) and isdetermined to take over the spirits of kung fu masters because. He is anassociate of Master Oogway, and that is how he is known (this joke getsreally old really fast within the film itself). Sadly, the film itself lazily meets these expectationswithout providing much else for its fan base.We start with an uninteresting villain played by J.K.
#Who won battlebots 2018 how to#
Kung Fu Panda 3 meets the minimum requirements in what fans of thefirst two films would expect: jokes about weight, Po's still strugglingwith handling Kung Fu (even though he became the 'dragon warrior' atthe end of the first film) and questions of how to determine what truefamily is. But for someonemore mature, that kind of easy is just boring. Maybe thekids will love such glossy happy ending, just like they love playingvideo games in god mode: easy win, plain and simple. The only thingthat's left is the divine perfection and invulnerability. The complexity is gone,the humanity, with all its inherent flaws, is gone. And, at the end of the day, KFP3finished creating a cult of the Dragon Warrior by transforming Po froma goofus with a heart and spirit to some kind of omnipotent goldenBuddha, smiling and just-be-yourself-preaching. So each next film was basicallycreating a new villain out of thin air (or, in this film's case, fromthe other world, literally) and imposing the duty of defeating him onPo, using it as a justification for granting him another magic ability.The gods are what we create ourselves. But letting him keep that spirit wouldmean losing pace for the franchise. Po is not aleader, he's not even a hero, he's just a guy who does what he canbecause his heart tells him so. It'swhere the pursuit of a dream was replaced with a job. Po's power was in finally letting himself pursue the dreamhe's been having on his own for so long, and in how a true dream canovercome any obstacle on its way.The problems began when Po was raised to the supreme position.
First film's Po wasso great because he was a classic 'loser with a dream' type ofcharacter: confined in his bleak reality but refusing to accept hisdestiny. So it's no wonder thatmy greatest wish for every next KFP movie was to have him back somehow.Those vain hopes.The villain's complexity became the foundation on which the rest of thestory could develop. One of the reasons behind thefirst film's excellence was Tai Lung, a character so intense,conflicted and deeply rooted in the history of the KFP universe, thathis story managed to combine the vibes of two great confrontations:Obi-Wan vs Darth Vader and Darth Vader vs Luke. The same rule actually applies to just about any storywith some kind of confrontation, with the best of such stories havingvillains which you even want to relate to.Kung Fu Panda trilogy is no exception. As a certain character once said, a James Bond movie is only as good asthe villain.